|
Post by mrsp on Feb 9, 2007 12:40:10 GMT -5
My statement was made in response to the excuse that "it doesn't effect me so I don't care". Get it? Yeah, so? It makes no sense GOM. You are again comparing apples and oranges.
|
|
|
Post by heathenesque on Feb 9, 2007 12:44:16 GMT -5
As usual, you can't debate the issue logically and rationally... so you have to throw in the red herring. No red herring. I get tired of people saying that it doesn't effect them directly so they don't give a sh*t. Raping children may be an extreme but it's against the law just like queers marrying is against the law. It's really hard to debate an issue logically or rationally with a liberal. What would you know about logical or rational? I'm not the one equating what two -CONSENTING ADULT HUMANS- do behind closed doors with bestiality or child molestation. I'd say I'm being quite logical and rational. You -STILL- haven't come up with any rational argument about how allowing same-sex marriages effect heterosexuals.
|
|
|
Post by heathenesque on Feb 9, 2007 12:45:10 GMT -5
Then again, allowing queers to marry is about as stupid an idea. Despite a few liberal judges and PC'ers crying for it. But why, though?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2007 13:19:53 GMT -5
My statement was made in response to the excuse that "it doesn't effect me so I don't care". Get it? Yeah, so? It makes no sense GOM. You are again comparing apples and oranges. For gawds sake. I made NO comparison. I pointed out how ridiculous an argument was.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2007 13:20:51 GMT -5
Then again, allowing queers to marry is about as stupid an idea. Despite a few liberal judges and PC'ers crying for it. But why, though? ::)Answered, several times already.
|
|
|
Post by heathenesque on Feb 9, 2007 14:19:16 GMT -5
::)Answered, several times already. No it hasn't. All I've gotten from you is that it'll destroy marriage and it's disgusting. I'm still waiting to find out HOW allowing same-sex unions will destroy marriage, and it being disgusting is a matter of opinion. I think brussels sprouts are disgusting, but I'm not wanting to make them illegal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2007 14:34:50 GMT -5
::)Answered, several times already. No it hasn't. All I've gotten from you is that it'll destroy marriage and it's disgusting. I'm still waiting to find out HOW allowing same-sex unions will destroy marriage, and it being disgusting is a matter of opinion. I think brussels sprouts are disgusting, but I'm not wanting to make them illegal. And if brussel sprouts were illegal I'm sure you'd jump on the band wagon to legalize them if it seemed to be the PC thing to do. And yeah, it has. Can't help it if you can't grasp it. Must be a conservative type thing since you're having so much trouble.
|
|
|
Post by heathenesque on Feb 9, 2007 14:39:18 GMT -5
No it hasn't. All I've gotten from you is that it'll destroy marriage and it's disgusting. I'm still waiting to find out HOW allowing same-sex unions will destroy marriage, and it being disgusting is a matter of opinion. I think brussels sprouts are disgusting, but I'm not wanting to make them illegal. And if brussel sprouts were illegal I'm sure you'd jump on the band wagon to legalize them if it seemed to be the PC thing to do. And yeah, it has. Can't help it if you can't grasp it. Must be a conservative type thing since you're having so much trouble. It has nothing to do with PCism. It has EVERYTHING to do with equality. And hey, if brussels sprouts were made illegal, you're right, I would "jump on the bandwagon". After all, they have nutritional value, some people like them, and they do no harm to anyone. Just because I find them disgusting doesn't mean that -everyone- finds them so... and why should people who like brussels sprouts be punished over something that's harmless? It's not like brussels sprouts force anyone to eat them, after all.
|
|
|
Post by heathenesque on Feb 9, 2007 14:40:28 GMT -5
And yeah, it has. Can't help it if you can't grasp it. Must be a conservative type thing since you're having so much trouble. Then why don't you be a 'gentleman' and point out your so-called "rational' argument against same-sex unions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2007 14:44:28 GMT -5
And yeah, it has. Can't help it if you can't grasp it. Must be a conservative type thing since you're having so much trouble. Then why don't you be a 'gentleman' and point out your so-called "rational' argument against same-sex unions. I've been addressing the "marriage" issue, not queer unions.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2007 14:47:03 GMT -5
And if brussel sprouts were illegal I'm sure you'd jump on the band wagon to legalize them if it seemed to be the PC thing to do. And yeah, it has. Can't help it if you can't grasp it. Must be a conservative type thing since you're having so much trouble. It has nothing to do with PCism. It has EVERYTHING to do with equality. And hey, if brussels sprouts were made illegal, you're right, I would "jump on the bandwagon". After all, they have nutritional value, some people like them, and they do no harm to anyone. Just because I find them disgusting doesn't mean that -everyone- finds them so... and why should people who like brussels sprouts be punished over something that's harmless? It's not like brussels sprouts force anyone to eat them, after all. Equality my azz. What rights are queers denied, that anyone else is allowed? That's pure BS. As far as the brussel sprouts and queers you're comparing "apples and oranges", to use MrsP's terminology. What nutritional value does reaming rectums have?
|
|
|
Post by heathenesque on Feb 9, 2007 14:51:15 GMT -5
It has nothing to do with PCism. It has EVERYTHING to do with equality. And hey, if brussels sprouts were made illegal, you're right, I would "jump on the bandwagon". After all, they have nutritional value, some people like them, and they do no harm to anyone. Just because I find them disgusting doesn't mean that -everyone- finds them so... and why should people who like brussels sprouts be punished over something that's harmless? It's not like brussels sprouts force anyone to eat them, after all. Equality my azz. What rights are queers denied, that anyone else is allowed? That's pure BS. As far as the brussel sprouts and queers you're comparing "apples and oranges", to use MrsP's terminology. What nutritional value does reaming rectums have? What does reaming rectums have to do with marriage?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2007 14:53:46 GMT -5
Equality my azz. What rights are queers denied, that anyone else is allowed? That's pure BS. As far as the brussel sprouts and queers you're comparing "apples and oranges", to use MrsP's terminology. What nutritional value does reaming rectums have? What does reaming rectums have to do with marriage? A great question for your queer friends.
|
|
|
Post by firstlady on Feb 9, 2007 14:54:13 GMT -5
Equality my azz. What rights are queers denied, that anyone else is allowed? That's pure BS. As far as the brussel sprouts and queers you're comparing "apples and oranges", to use MrsP's terminology. What nutritional value does reaming rectums have? What does reaming rectums have to do with marriage?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2007 14:56:20 GMT -5
What does reaming rectums have to do with marriage? Also a great question for your queer friends...
|
|