Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2007 16:59:18 GMT -5
I thought I just answered that, but if lesbians lick each other's rectums, maybe not. Lets talk about them too. ;D See you say that w/ a smile....I knew it...it's OK for women to be together but not men....is that what you are saying? No, if what you say is true, and the smile was because I doubt it, then they are just as disgusting as the male queers.
|
|
|
Post by Chevy on Feb 7, 2007 17:00:26 GMT -5
Of course. Men with men is just plain disgusting, but women with women is hot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2007 17:14:42 GMT -5
Of course. Men with men is just plain disgusting, but women with women is hot. Haven't read all the thread have you. I stated that what females do (to my knowledge) is not as disgusting as what male queers do...comprende? Not as disgusting hardly makes them hot. Or was that YOUR opinion?
|
|
|
Post by Chevy on Feb 7, 2007 17:18:06 GMT -5
No, it's the opinion of most males. I wasn't talking about you specifically. ;D And besides, I thought you knew about the 'thang' between Mrs P and I.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2007 17:20:25 GMT -5
And besides, I thought you knew about the 'thang' between Mrs P and I. No, but I've had my suspicions, all you libs are pretty kinky.
|
|
|
Post by Affirmative Action Jackson on Feb 7, 2007 17:35:49 GMT -5
[ marriage as a unique relationship by which a man and a woman are joined together for the primary purpose of forming and maintaining a family. Bull hocky! The biggest reason for legal marriage has been power and inheritance, control of property. For the vast majority of history children were considered a labor force, the more the better since a high percentage died. The idea of marriage to protect children is a very recent idea. Inheritance is a derivative of heredity which means offspring, parents, children, genes, etc.
|
|
|
Post by diplomat on Feb 7, 2007 17:44:43 GMT -5
Bull hocky! The biggest reason for legal marriage has been power and inheritance, control of property. For the vast majority of history children were considered a labor force, the more the better since a high percentage died. The idea of marriage to protect children is a very recent idea. Most of the population in history were POOR. They had no power, inheritance nor property to control. The primary purpose of marriage was forming and maintaining a legitimate family unit.
|
|
|
Post by mrsp on Feb 7, 2007 17:54:16 GMT -5
Inheritance is a derivative of heredity which means offspring, parents, children, genes, etc. But the bottom line was not the welfare of the children, it was the control of property. Children were viewed as a means of passing down stuff in a family but also as perfectly expendable. Hence the large families becusue so many died because they were not being protected by the family. Inheritance through marriage and adoption was equally acceptable. The bottom line was the motive behind marriage was not to protect the children but to protect the property.
|
|
|
Post by mrsp on Feb 7, 2007 17:55:48 GMT -5
[Most of the population in history were POOR. They had no power, inheritance nor property to control. The primary purpose of marriage was forming and maintaining a legitimate family unit. Yup most were poor. And the purpose of marriage was to create a family to create a labor force, not any romanticized view of protecting children or women for that matter. The only way of surviving was creating that labor force.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2007 17:57:24 GMT -5
Inheritance is a derivative of heredity which means offspring, parents, children, genes, etc. But the bottom line was not the welfare of the children, it was the control of property. Children were viewed as a means of passing down stuff in a family but also as perfectly expendable. Hence the large families becusue so many died because they were not being protected by the family. Inheritance through marriage and adoption was equally acceptable. The bottom line was the motive behind marriage was not to protect the children but to protect the property. So leaving what you have worked for all your life to your children is "protecting your property"? You are DEAD, why would you care? Seems to me leaving it to your kids IS protecting your children.
|
|
|
Post by mrsp on Feb 7, 2007 18:13:43 GMT -5
[ So leaving what you have worked for all your life to your children is "protecting your property"? You are DEAD, why would you care? Seems to me leaving it to your kids IS protecting your children. Well, back then it was usually to a single child, the oldest and to hell with the rest of them. But the concern was to keep the family property together, not do the right thing by the children. If it had been concern for the children, inheritance laws would not have been such that the oldest male got everything and the rest lived on the largesse of that oldest male child.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2007 19:41:02 GMT -5
[ So leaving what you have worked for all your life to your children is "protecting your property"? You are DEAD, why would you care? Seems to me leaving it to your kids IS protecting your children. Well, back then it was usually to a single child, the oldest and to hell with the rest of them. But the concern was to keep the family property together, not do the right thing by the children. If it had been concern for the children, inheritance laws would not have been such that the oldest male got everything and the rest lived on the largesse of that oldest male child. Back in those days the eldest son was expected to take care of his siblings. I disagree. With the size of families back then to split it several ways made the whole idea pretty ridiculous.
|
|
|
Post by OldHippieDude on Feb 7, 2007 19:47:58 GMT -5
Of course. Men with men is just plain disgusting, but women with women is hot. I keep hearing that from women, but I think a woman on a woman is just as repulsive. I've never known any men that would get off on that kind of pervy stuff. Peace, OHD
|
|
|
Post by firstlady on Feb 7, 2007 20:16:44 GMT -5
Of course. Men with men is just plain disgusting, but women with women is hot. I keep hearing that from women, but I think a woman on a woman is just as repulsive. I've never known any men that would get off on that kind of pervy stuff. Peace, OHD You don't get out much do ya?? It's a lot of mens dream to have two girls and not just paying attention to him but to each other too....
|
|
|
Post by Chevy on Feb 7, 2007 21:03:25 GMT -5
Yup. It's right up there with spanking. Personally, I just don't get it, but it really seems to be a popular kink with many men.
|
|